<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Giants Considered Trading for Braylon Edwards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/03/22/report-giants-considered-trading-for-braylon-edwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/03/22/report-giants-considered-trading-for-braylon-edwards/</link>
	<description>The Definitive New York Giants Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason C.</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/03/22/report-giants-considered-trading-for-braylon-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1115#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>No way do you give up two picks and a player for one player, those are the kind of trades that can put your organization behind for years...
I&#039;d give up the 2 and 5, and maybe, if they wanted a receiver, a 2 OR 3 and Manningham, and NOTHING more...
Edwards is NOT a top receiver, he&#039;s a legit number one on a decent team, but on a championship caliber team, he&#039;s barely a top guy, pairing him up with Plax though could be interesting, but I&#039;d rather go with Holt personally...
Honestly, Edwards is about as good as Hixon, they can both stretch the field, and neither can hold onto a ball...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way do you give up two picks and a player for one player, those are the kind of trades that can put your organization behind for years&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;d give up the 2 and 5, and maybe, if they wanted a receiver, a 2 OR 3 and Manningham, and NOTHING more&#8230;<br />
Edwards is NOT a top receiver, he&#8217;s a legit number one on a decent team, but on a championship caliber team, he&#8217;s barely a top guy, pairing him up with Plax though could be interesting, but I&#8217;d rather go with Holt personally&#8230;<br />
Honestly, Edwards is about as good as Hixon, they can both stretch the field, and neither can hold onto a ball&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoneWizard</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/03/22/report-giants-considered-trading-for-braylon-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>LoneWizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1115#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>Is JR crazy? Edwards is a true number one receiver. Plax is 32 years old and we need a replacement this year or very soon. We have Plax and a bunch of number 3 receivers. Give the Browns our second and Fifth round picks and any receiver on our roster for Edwards. Give them both second round picks. We need a number one and if we draft a receiver it will take a couple of years to mature into a one. Pull the trigger Jerry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is JR crazy? Edwards is a true number one receiver. Plax is 32 years old and we need a replacement this year or very soon. We have Plax and a bunch of number 3 receivers. Give the Browns our second and Fifth round picks and any receiver on our roster for Edwards. Give them both second round picks. We need a number one and if we draft a receiver it will take a couple of years to mature into a one. Pull the trigger Jerry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

