<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kiwianuka for Edwards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/</link>
	<description>The Definitive New York Giants Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:16:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Bartolis</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5486</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Bartolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1460#comment-5486</guid>
		<description>Hanshi.

Mathias Kiwanuka has 16 sacks in THREE seasons.  Edwards had 16 Touchdowns two years ago.

The Giants get the better end of the deal straight up.



Evan B-I don&#039;t think the Browns will take a Hixon and a 2nd?

Why would they. That&#039;s not great value for them. They might as well Keep Edwards he&#039;ll be cheap for another year or two if they watn to keep him there.

I think we&#039;re looking at a 1st and a fifth or something like our late 2nd and a 3rd. 


Danepitzl.

I agree, obviouisly.

Natalie-

I&#039;m not saying DE&#039;s never get hurt.

What I am saying though is that Kiwianuka wont&#039; be here for the long term, Braylon Edwards might be.

Also, the Giants have done an Excellent job of drafting DE that fit their system and I think they can easily replace Kiwianuka this year in the draft-WR&#039;s generally take three years to transition.


Thanks, everyone, for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hanshi.</p>
<p>Mathias Kiwanuka has 16 sacks in THREE seasons.  Edwards had 16 Touchdowns two years ago.</p>
<p>The Giants get the better end of the deal straight up.</p>
<p>Evan B-I don&#8217;t think the Browns will take a Hixon and a 2nd?</p>
<p>Why would they. That&#8217;s not great value for them. They might as well Keep Edwards he&#8217;ll be cheap for another year or two if they watn to keep him there.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re looking at a 1st and a fifth or something like our late 2nd and a 3rd. </p>
<p>Danepitzl.</p>
<p>I agree, obviouisly.</p>
<p>Natalie-</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying DE&#8217;s never get hurt.</p>
<p>What I am saying though is that Kiwianuka wont&#8217; be here for the long term, Braylon Edwards might be.</p>
<p>Also, the Giants have done an Excellent job of drafting DE that fit their system and I think they can easily replace Kiwianuka this year in the draft-WR&#8217;s generally take three years to transition.</p>
<p>Thanks, everyone, for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5481</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1460#comment-5481</guid>
		<description>Yeah, because DE&#039;s never get hurt or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, because DE&#8217;s never get hurt or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daneptizl</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5479</link>
		<dc:creator>daneptizl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1460#comment-5479</guid>
		<description>I was thinking the same thing. I like Kiwi, but he can still be moved for Edwards. The momentum just keeps increasing up to Saturday...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the same thing. I like Kiwi, but he can still be moved for Edwards. The momentum just keeps increasing up to Saturday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evan b</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5478</link>
		<dc:creator>evan b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1460#comment-5478</guid>
		<description>i think right now, edwards is better at his position that kiwi is at his. i say dont get rid of kiwi, because, as we&#039;ve realized, injuries happen. also, you can never have too many pass rushers. 

i say we trade hixon and the later 2nd round pick for him, which i heard the browns might do. then, we can grab a linebacker should one be there at the end of the first round, such as james laurinitis. or, if we do give away that 1st round pick, clint sintim will probably be there in the 2nd round for the saints&#039; pick we received. 

i say a linebacker and a receiver can be the final pieces of the puzzle for another super bowl run. the d line is perfect as is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think right now, edwards is better at his position that kiwi is at his. i say dont get rid of kiwi, because, as we&#8217;ve realized, injuries happen. also, you can never have too many pass rushers. </p>
<p>i say we trade hixon and the later 2nd round pick for him, which i heard the browns might do. then, we can grab a linebacker should one be there at the end of the first round, such as james laurinitis. or, if we do give away that 1st round pick, clint sintim will probably be there in the 2nd round for the saints&#8217; pick we received. </p>
<p>i say a linebacker and a receiver can be the final pieces of the puzzle for another super bowl run. the d line is perfect as is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Cassel</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5476</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Cassel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1460#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>I think that trading kiwi for edwards would be a good move his contract is ganna be up soon and where better off getting something for him. theres no way the giants are giving kiwi another big time DE contract because osi has one tuck has one and canty now has one mine as well give him to the browns and get edwards then lock him up with a long term contract i think this would be the best move then we have alot of draft picks still we can trade up and get a big time tight end in the higher picks or an O-Lineman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that trading kiwi for edwards would be a good move his contract is ganna be up soon and where better off getting something for him. theres no way the giants are giving kiwi another big time DE contract because osi has one tuck has one and canty now has one mine as well give him to the browns and get edwards then lock him up with a long term contract i think this would be the best move then we have alot of draft picks still we can trade up and get a big time tight end in the higher picks or an O-Lineman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanshi</title>
		<link>http://www.giantsgab.com/2009/04/20/kiwianuka-for-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-5465</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantsgab.com/?p=1460#comment-5465</guid>
		<description>Straight up?  The Browns would have to give the Giants MORE than Edwards for Kiwi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straight up?  The Browns would have to give the Giants MORE than Edwards for Kiwi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
