Tom Coughlin: The Man They Still Love To Hate

Tom Coughlin: The Man They Still Love To Hate.
By Martin Alvin.

Seems like, every time I post an article critical of the Giants’ 2013 season, someone admonishes me for not blaming Tom Coughlin, too. And, of course, since Coughlin’s the head coach, he should share in the blame; so, those who admonish me have a valid point. But the problem is, many of them angrily go on to say he’s not a good coach, or he’s too old; or, they just want him gone. And while I respect everyone’s right to their own opinion, it seems to me, there are, and always have been, people who just don’t like the guy and never will. Period!

As recently as November, 2011, in a Sporting News Poll of 111 NFL players, Tom Coughlin was voted the coach those players would least like to play for -– and this was just four years after he won SB XLII and only three months before he’d lead the Giants to a win in SB XLVI; both victories over the coach who came in third in the poll: Bill Belichick. To paraphrase the players voting, they contended:

NFL players like a more flexible coach than Coughlin … and Coughlin is too old school … he’s like Bill Parcells, he’s my way or the highway … he won’t bend at all and that’s not the kind of coach you want to play for.

And way back, on December 26th 2004, toward the end of Coughlin’s first season as Giant’s head coach, in an article for Scouts Inc., Ken Palmer quoted numerous Giants players as saying they hated Tom Coughlin and would never play hard for him and they said Coughlin would never win.

Some beat writers back then referred to Coughlin as Major Tom, and not in a flattering way, either. Others said he’d never get any free agents to sign with Giants because no one wanted to play for him. Some players, not already with the Giants, concurred, saying they’d never consider playing for the guy -– no matter how much money was being offered.

But, in spite of those dire predictions, dozens of free agents have signed with Giants over the last decade. Probably, because the Giants’ money is just as green as everyone else’s money. Somehow, their dislike for Coughlin was tempered by the money. What else is new? As H.L. Mencken, the journalist and satirist, once said: “When they say it’s not about the money … it’s about the money!”

And players who initially hated him; guys like Michael Strahan and Antrel Rolle, who couldn’t understand his strict rules, now say they wouldn’t want to play for anyone else. Chris Canty – while still with the Giants — was quoted as saying:

“I have no clue why he doesn’t get the credit he deserves, but Coach (Coughlin) doesn’t spend time thinking about it. It’s not the type of person he is and, quite frankly, it’s not the type of team he wants to coach. People who know football understand just how good a football coach he is … and he’s the same guy every day.”

This is not to say Tom Coughlin didn’t deserve some criticism; he did. For one thing, he really was an old school, tyrant, a my-way-or-the-highway guy, and that had to be culture shock for Jim Fassel’s country club players. But, they didn’t hire him to be a Jim Fassel clone; they wanted an old school disciplinarian because the team needed it. And, credit where credit is due; when called upon by management to soften his approach, he did.

And, then, there was his infamous pronouncement at his initial press conference, when he took a swipe at Fassel’s tenure and dismissed injuries as a mental thing:

“I’m aware of the injury factor … the number of IRs … which is a cancer, let’s face it. It’s something that has to be corrected. It’s a mental thing, I believe, as much as anything else.”

But, let’s face it, it took a tyrant to force Jim Fassel’s “pet” player, Tiki Barber, to change his running style in order to stop his chronic fumbling problem; and it turned Barber into one of the best backs in the NFL. And, yes, clearly, Coughlin was wrong about the injures being a “mental thing.” But here’s the irony of that: while his teams have, in fact, and much to his chagrin, suffered more injuries — year in and year out — than most teams in the last ten years; in spite of those injuries, his record is:

2004 – 6-10 – No Playoffs
2005 – 11-5 – Lost Wild Card
2006 – 8-8 –  Lost Wild Card
2007 – 10-6 – Won SB XLII
2008 – 12-4 – Lost Division Game
2009 – 8-8 – No Playoffs
2010 – 10-6 – No Playoffs
2011 – 9-7 – Won SB XLVI
2012 – 9-7 – No Playoffs
2013 – 7-9 – No Playoffs

That’s a total, ten-year, won/lost record of 90-70, which translates to a yearly 9-7 won/lost record, with only two non-winning seasons, five playoffs appearances and two Super Bowl Championships -– with a ton of injuries! That’s not an example of the inflexibility his detractors referred to; it’s just the opposite.

And this off-season, selflessly, flexibly, he’s making adjustments by putting aside his loyalties to long time assistants like Mike Pope and Jerald Ingram, in order to update and improve the team for 2014 and for the future even beyond that.

I wonder how many other teams in the NFL would like to have a head coach who’d bring them eight winning seasons out in the next ten, as well as five playoff appearances, and two Super Bowl Championships. My hunch is; there are more than just a few.

Whether you like Coughlin or you hate him; his record speaks for itself: plain and simple, the guy is a hell of a football coach. And yet, for some reason, bizarrely, sadly, he remains, Tom Coughlin: the man they still love to hate.


Enjoyed this post?
Subscribe to Giants Gab via RSS Feed or E-mail and receive daily news updates from us!

Submit to Digg  Stumble This Story  Share on Twitter  Post on Facebook  Post on MySpace  Add to del.icio.us  Bark It Up  Submit to Reddit  Fave on Technorati

4 Responses to “Tom Coughlin: The Man They Still Love To Hate”

  1. Chris says:

    I think he is a great coach. Always prepared. For all the complainers I can remember the late 60’s and 70’s. Those horrible years. I really appreciate his style and consistency. We will miss him when he is gone.

  2. John says:

    I love Coughlin my only regret is that they didn’t let Gilbride retire earlier. Coughlin is exactly like Parcells and guys that play for him wouldn’t want to play for anyone else. That is why we have people that leave as free agents (because of money or cuts)and want to come back. Jacobs and Ross just this past year. Coughlin also had player support from Jacksonville players that said the same thing.

  3. RON JOHN says:

    Anyone who compares a Tom Coughlin coached team to a Bill Parcells coached team is – ah – well -ah – fool! No, a Giant fool!

    And anyone who suggests that the warm hearted 68 year old coach is still making good sound decisions is -ah – well -ah – a fool! A bigger Giant fool.

    Seven million dollars, that what the Giants held up to TC – make changes or you are history…all three of the coaches fired this week were hired by – don’t look now -TC!

    And any one who suggests that the last Super Bowl was because TC out coached his opponent is-ah-well- ah -well you get it…

    As good as “The Tuna” ridiculous!

  4. buljos says:

    There was a time when I didn’t think he was a great coach, but instead a one-size-fits-all coach. He proved however that he could adapt, and change for the better. Strahan and others confirmed this. Changing to produce championships makes him a top tier coach. Is he one of the very best? Doubtful. Is he a leader, and the right coach for the Giants culture? Undoubtedly. I’m really looking forward to the results of his collaboration with Ben McAdoo in 2015, because if the Giants offense takes off under a rejuvenated and more disciplined Eli working some blend of Packers-Giants scheme, behind a solid line, with a few key FAs, and the defense continues to occupy a top 10 spot, the Giants will be very dangerous. It would appear Coughlin’s looking forward to what his new OC and support coaching staff can do… I was wrong about Coughlin being adamant about bringing Sullivan in behind Gilbride. Coughlin wants change too.

Leave a Reply